Riot police in New York City, on the wrong side as usual, assault a citizen exercising free speech

Helping prop up New School President, who should be out on his ass, the NYC police helped arrest 22 peaceful protesters who occupied a building on campus. They were charged with burglary, riot and criminal mischief charges. (What, no TERRORISM charges that the government is so fashionably tossing around like Mardi Gras beads anymore?). After the students retrenched in Union Square, they marched toward President Kerry's house and once again the police were on hand to stifle dissent.

Earlier as Der Fuhrer Bloomberg's police stormed the building being occupied a police officer knocked a man to the ground then a MOB of police officers arrested the man for daring to say to police "How Dare you". This now is an arrestable (and apparently assault-worthy) offense in New York when police are attacking, openly attacking first amendment speech.

This is gonna get ugly people, when strong arm police tactics stifle free speech they need to be stood up to. Maybe a few cops in NYC would to well to get a punch in the mouth and realize just how wrong they're being and just WHAT they stand violently in support of.

Get video of these cops people, get badge numbers, there are names hiding behind these badges and they MUST and WILL be held accountable in some way. They work FOR you, they are PUBLIC servants and thusly their names are PUBLIC record. Stand up to these thugs. YOU have rights against them too. Read and listen citizens (With a word and language warning for this clip):


Your Right of Defense Against Unlawful Arrest

"Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary." Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: "Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed."